Skip to content

docs: add Unsloth GGUF validation case study - #5

Merged
200lz merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
case-study/unsloth-gemma4-e2b-it-q8-gguf
Aug 13, 2026
Merged

docs: add Unsloth GGUF validation case study#5
200lz merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
case-study/unsloth-gemma4-e2b-it-q8-gguf

Conversation

@200lz

@200lz 200lz commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • add OMIV Case Study 01 for an Unsloth Gemma 4 E2B IT Q8_0 GGUF export
  • record the successful export and retained historical artifact-identity match
  • add machine-readable results, claims, evidence definitions, methodology, and limitations
  • document provenance-observability and main/mmproj association boundaries without attributing them to a specific component

Context

This case began with a public technical exchange with Daniel Han. We are grateful to Daniel for suggesting Gemma 4 E2B IT and for giving OMIV the opportunity to test a real Unsloth export path.

This does not claim a formal partnership, certification, endorsement, or Unsloth approval of the results.

Important boundaries

  • historical C1 bytes were unavailable
  • no new direct C1/C2 byte comparison was performed
  • semantic and numerical fidelity were not evaluated
  • runtime compatibility was not evaluated
  • no model weights or private evidence are included

Validation

  • 1,888 tests passed; 9 expected skips
  • case-study SHA256SUMS verified
  • all 21 claims and 11 evidence IDs resolved
  • git diff --check passed
  • both retained GGUF hashes remained unchanged

@200lz
200lz marked this pull request as ready for review August 13, 2026 12:10
@200lz
200lz merged commit 9279ec7 into main Aug 13, 2026
4 checks passed
@200lz
200lz deleted the case-study/unsloth-gemma4-e2b-it-q8-gguf branch August 13, 2026 12:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant